Saturday, November 6, 2021

 

A reasonable answer is rarely found in immediacy. Especially when dealing with such a complex event.

The Alec Baldwin involved shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins has amassed worldwide media attention. At this point, the shooting appears to have been some kind of tragically fatal accident with a prop gun. The information surrounding this incident is still very ambiguous because it is still undergoing investigation. However, the lack of clear and concise facts about the shooting have not slowed the spread of absurd conspiracies about it. The most prominent theory floating around on various social media platforms is that Hutchins was killed because she had information that could lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton. 

Alec Baldwin murdering someone in broad day light, on the set of a movie, as some kind of assassin working behalf of the Clinton family sounds like a book Ben Shapiro would write while on a meth bender. This theory finds its baseless roots in two separate pieces of information: Halyna’s husband, Matt Hutchins is a lawyer and the rest was derived from a fake tweet.

Matt Hutchins does practice law, but he was not the lawyer that represented Hilary Clinton during the Russian Probe incident as he was falsely accused by numerous users on Twitter. This theory is rooted in fiction. The lawyer that represented Clinton is named Michael Sussmann.   

As far as the fake tweet regarding Halyna Hutchins and her supposed information regarding Hilary Clinton, surprise! It’s also some bullshit. The first flaw in this tweet is that whoever made it added a verified check mark to her account. Hutchins was not verified. The second flaw for this tweet is its sheer laziness. Do you really think that someone that had information that could lead to the arrest of Hilary Clinton would just tweet that out word for word? Come on. Try a little but harder next time. A good conspiracy’s bread and butter is in the level of mystery that surrounds it. I’d have an easier time believing the tweet if it was written in clues. Like, “I have damaging information about a high profile politician. Hint: her husband is a connoisseur of high profile blow jobs and his third member has been attached to controversies stemming from Lewinski to Epstein.” If you’re going to make shit up, at least make it interesting.

The wild accusations that are surrounding Halyna Hutchins and Alec Baldwin are based in a strong dislike for Baldwin by members of the far-right, alt-right, and the unfortunately enduring Qanon. They have been waiting for years to have their moment of redemption against Baldwin. Their profound distaste for Baldwin comes from the four years he spent on Saturday Night Live shitting on former President Trump. And in a truly grotesque fashion, groups like those from the far-right have latched onto the loss of actual human life to spread lies in the name of political ideologies and mislead convictions. But just like most theories that have been created by these groups, they cannot be influenced or swayed by any opposing facts or ideas. This has become a common trend within these groups according to Jane Coaston with Vox. "Unfortunately, researchers have found that fact-based arguments against conspiracy theorists only serve to reinforce them in the minds of believers. That’s what makes QAnon or Sandy Hook trutherism or any other conspiracy theory so difficult to combat. Conspiracy theories aren’t based on facts; conspiracy theorists aren’t receptive to them, either." (Coaston, 2020) 

It is unclear as to where this rumor originated from exactly. The tweet (pictured below) was published on October 18 and at this time there is no information regarding who actually made it. But it may have something to do with that aforementioned Russian probe incident. Russian bots that are known for spreading misinformation to the American people. That is not a conspiracy theory. They are very real. "Two-thirds (66%) of all tweeted links were shared by suspected bots. This includes links to different kinds of content around the web." (Wojcik, 2018) Regardless of where this tweet came from, it does not make the spread of it any less deplorable.  

The most unfortunate part of misinformation being spread around the death of Halyna Hutchins is that this will probably cement itself in the ultra-right's rhetoric for a long time to come. Just like when the conspiracy surrounding Seth Rich's murder being carried out in order to protect the Clintons from going to prison made it all the way to the very influential platform of Sean Hannity. Although, those accusations have been found to be false and Rich's family settled out of court (for a shit ton of money) with the Fox News network and Hannity, the conspiracy is still alive and well. And that is mostly because with social media as a readily accessible format for nearly anyone, they can share information and add their own perspective as a caption. This has proven to have a powerful influence on those exposed to the posts. "Even when users share links to news articles, they can supplement the articles with their own commentary. Ideally this commentary is factual and based on the true information in the article, but it is plausible that this user-generated content is biased or inaccurate." (Carlson 2018).  

This is why fact checking articles is of paramount importance in this day and age. If a story seems inflated, it most likely is. And this type of misinformation has redounding effects on Hutchins' surviving loved ones. What we share online has effects that we will never feel but could be crippling to someone else.   

She had a family. She had friends. She had loved ones that certainly wish she was still here. That’s why the conspiratorial ideas about her being murdered by Alec Baldwin due to some baseless claims that she had info about the Clintons are despicable. 

The people that push these theories are the same people that are constantly crying out for justice from “fake news”. But where is the justice in spreading bullshit? Sure, you may not like Alec Baldwin, but to make him the villain in your make believe thriller about American justice that is set in our shared realities is fucking insulting. 

The regard for the loss of human life at a distance is interesting. 

The idea of the innocent being harmed is a commonly disparaging theme throughout all of mankind. But the farther we are from those that are harmed, the easier it is to lose our humanity. But no matter how far detached you are from Alec Baldwin and Halyna Hutchins it is deplorable to use this tragedy as a catalyst to entertain your own ideologies. 

Before I get too high and mighty on disparaging these crack pot conspirators, I must make a confession. I don’t know Alec Baldwin, nor did I know Halyna Hutchins. And that is precisely why I would catch myself laughing at memes that depicted Baldwin as having a teardrop tattoo on his face. Or the one where he was awarded a Combat Infantryman’s Badge. The list goes on and on. And let’s be honest, most of us laughed at or shared content about this tragedy. And I’ll just go out and say it. That’s ok. 

We are simple humans living in some seriously confusing times. And if we can’t find humor in the absurdity that surrounds us, then we should all be thrown directly into the ground because we are not living. It may be dark (and not for everyone) but there is humor to be found in an A list actor killing someone on set with a prop gun. 

This type of humor is dark and vile. I’ll be the first to admit that, but so is the world. The bleakness of our existence will overwhelm you if you don’t poke some fucking fun at it. That I can assure you. 

But making the world even more bleak by spreading lies is where I firmly draw my line in the sand. No one can change the fact that she was killed, but we can stop insulting her legacy with erroneous lies. There is no more room for lies in an age where conspiracies are the new black. 

 

Sources used: 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/8/1/17253444/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory-4chan-explainer 

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/09/5-things-to-know-about-bots-on-twitter/ 

https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-did-halyna-hutchins-tweet-about-exposing-hillary-clinton-shortly-before-she-died-60954  

"What to Believe? Social Media Commentary and Belief in Misinformation" by Nicolas M. Anspach · Taylor N. Carlson 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/10/28/fact-check-fake-tweet-circulates-after-accidental-shooting-halyna-huchins/8545665002/

No comments:

Post a Comment